P-OGC26 Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy- a systematic review and evaluation of benchmarking parameters
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Background Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used in the treatment of esophageal cancer. The learning curve for minimally oesophagectomy (MIO) is variable and can impact on patient outcomes. aim this study was to review current evidence curves MIO identify which parameters benchmarking. Methods A search major reference databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane) performed with no time limits up February 2020. Results were screened line Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included if an assessment reported on, regardless (if any) statistical method used. Twenty-nine studies comprising 3741 patients included. Twenty-two a combination thoracoscopic, hybrid total MIO, 6 robotic assisted (RAMIE) alone 1 evaluated both RAMIE thoracoscopic esophagectomies. Operating most frequently parameter determine progression (23/39 studies), number resected lymph nodes, morbidity blood loss also Learning found plateau at 7-60 cases esophagectomy, 12-175 thoracoscopic/hybrid esophagectomy 9-85 RAMIE. Conclusions Multiple employed gauge progression. However, there validated or approved sets Further work required optimum that should be utilised ensure best outcomes length proctoring.
منابع مشابه
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
In the second stage, the patient is placed in a supine position for laparoscopic construction of the gastric conduit, placement of a feeding jejunostomy, and pyloroplasty. The third stage consists of mobilization of the cervical esophagus via the left neck, removal of the surgical specimen and gastric pull-up, and construction of an esophagogastric anastomosis. This phase of the operation is pe...
متن کاملComparison the Outcomes of Open Thoracotomy and Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer
Introduction: Surgery is the first therapeutic option for esophageal cancer. There is controversy over the selection of the best surgical approach. Regarding this, the present study aimed to compare the minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in terms of their short-term outcomes and preoperative complications. Materials & Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 61 patients i...
متن کاملReview of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Current Controversies
Esophagectomy is a complex operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was described in the 1990s in an effort to reduce operative morbidity. Since then many institutions have adopted and described their series with this technique. This paper reviews the literature on the variety of MIE techniques, clinical and quality of life outcomes with open ve...
متن کاملMinimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Evidence on the benefits of minimally invasive surgery over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery is continuing to accumulate. This is also the case for esophageal surgery. Esophageal cancer often requires extensive surgery and is, therefore, considered to be one of the most invasive elective gastrointestinal procedures. Clinical studies investigating means to reduce the invasive nature o...
متن کاملIs minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND Compared with open esophagectomy (OE), minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) proves to have clear benefits in reducing the risk of pulmonary complications for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The objectives of our study were to explore the superiority of MIE in reducing the occurrence of anastomotic leakages (ALs) when compared to OE. METHODS A systematic review and met...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Surgery
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1365-2168', '0007-1323']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab430.154